Teleological Argumentation

Teleological Argumentation is a formal mode of reasoning within philosophical theology that infers the existence and attributes of a purposive intelligence from observed order, complexity, or functionality in nature, distinguishing itself from other theological arguments by its reliance on apparent design as evidentiary grounds.

370

Publications

17.7K

Citations

428

Authors

258

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

72

Variants

Argument From DesignDesign Argument

Authors

428

  1. DK
    Deborah Kelemen

    Boston University, United States

    6 publications · 1.2K citations

    6

    h-index

  2. GS
    Giovanni Sartor

    University of Bologna, Italy

    3 publications · 152 citations

    3

    h-index

  3. JF
    Joseph F. Rychlak

    Loyola University Chicago, United States

    3 publications · 126 citations

    3

    h-index

  4. DH
    Devin Henry

    Western University, Canada

    3 publications · 114 citations

    3

    h-index

  5. KW
    K. W. M. Fulford

    University of Oxford, United Kingdom

    3 publications · 137 citations

    3

    h-index

1–5 of 428

Venues

  1. Choice Reviews Online

    CRO · 12 publications · 1.5K citations

    12

    h-index

  2. Phronesis

    6 publications · 279 citations

    6

    h-index

  3. Australasian Journal of Philosophy

    5 publications · 724 citations

    5

    h-index

  4. Synthese

    5 publications · 115 citations

    5

    h-index

  5. Philosophy of Science

    5 publications · 203 citations

    5

    h-index

1–5