Systematic Safety Argumentation
Systematic Safety Argumentation is a formal, structured methodology for constructing, validating, and maintaining a coherent safety case by logically organizing evidence, assumptions, and reasoning to demonstrate that a system is acceptably safe within its operational context.
5
Publications
477
Citations
20
Authors
11
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
1
Parents
5
Magnus Gyllenhammar, Rolf Johansson, Fredrik Warg et al. · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) · 2020 · 64 citations · Full text
Argument Schemes in Computer System Safety Engineering
Tangming Yuan, Tim Kelly · Informal Logic · 2011 · 15 citations · Full text
Assessing complex computer based systems using the Goal Structuring Notation
S P Wilson, John McDermid, Clive Pygott et al. · 2002 · 11 citations
1–5 of 5
20
Laboratoire d'Analyse et d'Architecture des Systèmes, France
1 publications · 17 citations
1
h-index
1
h-index
1
h-index
1
h-index
1
h-index
1–5 of 20
11

University of York
York, United Kingdom
2 h-index
4 publications
52 citations

Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Paris, France
1 h-index
1 publications
17 citations

KTH Royal Institute of Technology
Stockholm, Sweden
1 h-index
2 publications
128 citations
Defence Science and Technology Agency
Singapore, Singapore
1 h-index
2 publications
22 citations
Semcon (Sweden)
Gothenburg, Sweden
1 h-index
1 publications
64 citations
Volvo (Sweden)
Gothenburg, Sweden
1 h-index
2 publications
128 citations
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden
Gothenburg, Sweden
1 h-index
2 publications
128 citations

Laboratoire d'Analyse et d'Architecture des Systèmes
Toulouse, France
1 h-index
4 publications
68 citations
1–8 of 11
1 publications · 15 citations
1
h-index
Repository · 1 publications · 64 citations
1
h-index
Repository · 1 publications · 370 citations
1
h-index
1–3