Systematic Safety Argumentation

Systematic Safety Argumentation is a formal, structured methodology for constructing, validating, and maintaining a coherent safety case by logically organizing evidence, assumptions, and reasoning to demonstrate that a system is acceptably safe within its operational context.

5

Publications

477

Citations

20

Authors

11

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

1

Authors

20

  1. DP
    David Powell

    Laboratoire d'Analyse et d'Architecture des Systèmes, France

    1 publications · 17 citations

    1

    h-index

  2. SU
    Stig Ursing

    Volvo (Sweden), Sweden

    1 publications · 64 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. JS
    Jan Söderberg

    GMT Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (China)

    1 publications · 64 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. TK
    Timothy Kelly

    University of York, United Kingdom

    1 publications · 370 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. TK
    Tim Kelly

    University of York, United Kingdom

    1 publications · 15 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 20

Venues

  1. Informal Logic

    1 publications · 15 citations

    1

    h-index

  2. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)

    Repository · 1 publications · 64 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique)

    Repository · 1 publications · 370 citations

    1

    h-index

1–3