Study Design Hierarchy

Study Design Hierarchy is a systematic ranking of research study designs within the field of evidence-based inquiry according to their susceptibility to bias, whereby higher levels are reserved for designs that more rigorously control confounding and support causal inference.

27

Publications

2.5K

Citations

59

Authors

48

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

8

Variants

Hierarchy Of Evidence

Authors

59

  1. LR
    Lee R. Allen

    The University of Queensland, Australia

    1 publications · 14 citations

    1

    h-index

  2. SD
    Stephanie D. Gan

    Boston University, United States

    1 publications · 25 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. AÖ
    Ayşe Öncüler

    École Supérieure des Sciences Économiques et Commerciales, France

    1 publications · 169 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. JK
    Jüri Kartus

    Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden

    1 publications · 11 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. JJ
    Jie Jin Wang

    The University of Sydney, Australia

    1 publications · 34 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 59

Venues

  1. View

    1 publications · 43 citations

    1

    h-index

  2. 1

    h-index

  3. 1

    h-index

  4. Economic round-up

    1 publications · 21 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. Educational Researcher

    ER · 1 publications · 61 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5