Concepedia

Self-reported Use Bias

Self-Reported Use Bias is a methodological artifact in contraceptive effectiveness research arising when estimates of contraceptive performance are systematically distorted due to discrepancies between participants' reported usage behaviors and their actual behaviors, leading to misclassification of method success or failure.

38

Publications

2.4K

Citations

146

Authors

90

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

15

Parents

Publications

38

Misperceptions of the Norms for the Frequency of Alcohol and Other Drug Use on College Campuses

H. Wesley Perkins, Philip W. Meilman, Jami S. Leichliter et al. · Journal of American College Health · 1999 · 448 citations

, , +14

The Accuracy of Self-Reported Internet Use—A Validation Study Using Client Log Data

Michael Scharkow · Communication Methods and Measures · 2016 · 430 citations

, , +13

How Well Do People Report Time Spent on Facebook?

Sindhu Kiranmai Ernala, Moira Burke, Alex Leavitt et al. · 2020 · 181 citations · Full text

, , +15

Questionable research practices among italian research psychologists

Franca Agnoli, Jelte M. Wicherts, Coosje Lisabet Sterre Veldkamp et al. · PLoS ONE · 2017 · 180 citations · Full text

, , +6

Measuring mobile phone use: Gender, age and real usage level in relation to the accuracy and validity of self-reported mobile phone use

Mariek Vanden Abeele, Kathleen Beullens, Keith Roe · Mobile Media & Communication · 2013 · 123 citations

, , +13

1–5 of 38

Authors

146

  1. PP
    Paul P. Biemer

    RTI International, United States

    2 publications · 29 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. CC
    Connie Celum

    University of Washington, United States

    2 publications · 26 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. RH
    Renee Heffron

    University of Washington, United States

    2 publications · 26 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. MW
    Michael Witt

    Reproductive Biology Associates, United States

    2 publications · 29 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. JM
    Jared M. Baeten

    University of Washington, United States

    2 publications · 26 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5 of 146

Institutions

90

  1. RTI International

    Durham, United States

    2 h-index

    2 publications

    53 citations

  2. University of Pittsburgh

    Pittsburgh, United States

    2 h-index

    8 publications

    181 citations

  3. Tilburg University

    Tilburg, The Netherlands

    2 h-index

    3 publications

    483 citations

  4. University of Washington

    Seattle, United States

    2 h-index

    11 publications

    148 citations

  5. National Bureau of Economic Research

    Cambridge, United States

    1 h-index

    1 publications

    18 citations

  6. Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rouen

    Rouen, France

    1 h-index

    1 publications

    25 citations

  7. Indiana University

    Bloomington, United States

    1 h-index

    5 publications

    60 citations

  8. Seattle University

    Seattle, United States

    1 h-index

    3 publications

    36 citations

1–8 of 90

Venues

  1. Studies in Family Planning

    3 publications · 75 citations

    3

    h-index

  2. PLoS ONE

    2 publications · 194 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. AIDS and Behavior

    2 publications · 36 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. Communication Methods and Measures

    CMM · 2 publications · 466 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. Contraception

    2 publications · 49 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5