Scholastic Argumentation
Scholastic Argumentation is a formal method of dialectical reasoning within Scholastic Latin discourse that systematically employs syllogistic logic and authoritative textual sources to resolve theological or philosophical questions through structured opposing arguments and responses.
38
Publications
1.2K
Citations
38
Authors
19
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
1
Parents
38
Lorenzo Valla and Rudolph Agricola
John Monfasani · Journal of the history of philosophy · 1990 · 96 citations
William of Sherwood’s Treatise on Obligations
Eleonore Stump · Historiographia Linguistica · 1980 · 83 citations
PREDESTINATION AND POLITICAL CONFLICT IN LAUD'S LONDON
David R. Como · The Historical Journal · 2003 · 64 citations
1–5 of 38
38
2
h-index
2 publications · 79 citations
2
h-index
1
h-index
1 publications · 43 citations
1
h-index
1 publications · 24 citations
1
h-index
1–5 of 38
19

University of Edinburgh
Edinburgh, United Kingdom
2 h-index
2 publications
38 citations

Rice University
Houston, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
12 citations
New College
Swindon, United Kingdom
1 h-index
1 publications
28 citations

McGill University
Montreal, Canada
1 h-index
1 publications
25 citations
University of Cambridge
Cambridge, United Kingdom
1 h-index
1 publications
10 citations
Stanford University
Stanford, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
64 citations
University of Castilla-La Mancha
Ciudad Real, Spain
1 h-index
1 publications
13 citations

Hadassah Academic College
Jerusalem, Israel
1 h-index
1 publications
26 citations
1–8 of 19
2 publications · 46 citations
2
h-index
2 publications · 38 citations
2
h-index
JHP · 2 publications · 136 citations
2
h-index
AHR · 2 publications · 87 citations
2
h-index
1 publications · 17 citations
1
h-index
1–5