Concepedia

Run-length Bias

Run-Length Bias is a systematic error in experiment duration planning that arises when the length of a run differentially influences the observed outcomes, leading to distorted inferences due to unequal representation or sensitivity across varying run durations.

14

Publications

1.1K

Citations

40

Authors

21

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

2

Parents

Publications

14

A Reevaluation of the Duration of Survival after the Onset of Dementia

Christina Wolfson, David B. Wolfson, Masoud Asgharian et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2001 · 555 citations · Full text

, , +14

The relationship between track shortening and fission track age reduction in apatite: combined influences of inherent instability, annealing anisotropy, length bias and system calibration

P.F. Green · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · 1988 · 228 citations

, , +15

Population estimates of survival in women with screen-detected and symptomatic breast cancer taking account of lead time and length bias

Gill Lawrence, Matthew Wallis, P C Allgood et al. · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · 2008 · 56 citations · Full text

, , +17

Survival analysis under cross-sectional sampling: length bias and multiplicative censoring

Bert van Es, Chris A. J. Klaassen, Karin Groothuis‐Oudshoorn · Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference · 2000 · 56 citations

, , +16

Length Biasing and Laws Equivalent to the Log-Normal

Anthony G. Pakes · Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications · 1996 · 40 citations

, , +6

1–5 of 14

Authors

40

  1. SP
    Stephan Pelikan

    University of Cincinnati, United States

    1 publications · 37 citations

    1

    h-index

  2. WF
    William F. Punch

    Michigan State University, United States

    1 publications · 33 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. JD
    Jim D. Cave

    Pacific Salmon Commission, Canada

    1 publications · 13 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. GL
    Gill Lawrence

    University of Birmingham, United Kingdom

    1 publications · 56 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. WW
    Ward Whitt

    AT&T (United States), United States

    1 publications · 16 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 40

Institutions

21

  1. Centre international de recherche sur le cancer

    Lyon, France

    2 h-index

    2 publications

    32 citations

  2. Harvard University

    Cambridge, United States

    1 h-index

    1 publications

    32 citations

  3. University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust

    Coventry, United Kingdom

    1 h-index

    1 publications

    56 citations

  4. The University of Sydney

    Sydney, Australia

    1 h-index

    1 publications

    56 citations

  5. The University of Melbourne

    Melbourne, Australia

    1 h-index

    1 publications

    228 citations

  6. Radboud University Nijmegen

    Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    1 h-index

    1 publications

    56 citations

  7. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

    Rockville, United States

    1 h-index

    1 publications

    11 citations

  8. University of Birmingham

    Birmingham, United Kingdom

    1 h-index

    4 publications

    224 citations

1–8 of 21

Venues

  1. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference

    1 publications · 56 citations

    1

    h-index

  2. 1

    h-index

  3. New England Journal of Medicine

    NEJM · 1 publications · 555 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. PubMed

    Repository · 1 publications · 32 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. 1

    h-index

1–5