Reporting Completeness Measurement
Reporting Completeness Measurement is a methodological construct used in pharmacovigilance and clinical research to quantify the extent to which adverse event reports are fully and accurately documented within a surveillance system, distinguishing it from other reporting metrics by its focus on the comprehensiveness of data capture relative to expected or reference standards.
50
Publications
2.5K
Citations
249
Authors
129
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
18
50
The Devil Is in the Details: Incomplete Reporting in Preclinical Animal Research
Marc T. Avey, David Moher, Katrina Sullivan et al. · PLoS ONE · 2016 · 137 citations · Full text
Beate Wieseler, Natalia Wolfram, Natalie McGauran et al. · PLoS Medicine · 2013 · 131 citations · Full text
Pharmacy, Health Information Management, Outcomes Research +14
1–5 of 50
249
4
h-index
3
h-index
2
h-index
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, United States
2 publications · 48 citations
2
h-index
2
h-index
1–5 of 249
129

Ottawa Hospital
Ottawa, Canada
4 h-index
16 publications
1.8K citations
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Ottawa, Canada
4 h-index
16 publications
1.8K citations
University of Oxford
Oxford, United Kingdom
4 h-index
4 publications
323 citations

University of Ottawa
Ottawa, Canada
3 h-index
8 publications
888 citations

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Atlanta, United States
3 h-index
17 publications
589 citations

University of Toronto
Toronto, Canada
3 h-index
12 publications
306 citations
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris
Paris, France
2 h-index
9 publications
1.8K citations

Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre
Oxford, United Kingdom
2 h-index
1 publications
47 citations
1–8 of 129
Repository · 5 publications · 171 citations
5
h-index
2 publications · 150 citations
2
h-index
1 publications · 39 citations
2
h-index
2 publications · 420 citations
2
h-index
2 publications · 38 citations
2
h-index
1–5