Real-world Comparative Effectiveness
Real-World Comparative Effectiveness is a research paradigm within real-world evidence studies that evaluates the relative clinical or health outcomes of different interventions, strategies, or policies using data derived from routine clinical practice, distinguished by its reliance on observational or pragmatic data rather than controlled experimental conditions.
560
Publications
26.9K
Citations
4.9K
Authors
2K
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
414
Variants
Real-world Comparative Effectiveness Research
560
Douglas K Owens, Kathleen N Lohr, David C. Atkins et al. · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2009 · 511 citations
Public Affairs, Health Administration, Evidence-based Practice +16
1–5 of 560
4.9K
10
h-index
10
h-index
9
h-index
7
h-index
6
h-index
1–5 of 4.9K
2K
Harvard University
Cambridge, United States
17 h-index
91 publications
6.6K citations

Karolinska Institutet
Stockholm, Sweden
14 h-index
40 publications
3.4K citations
University College London
London, United Kingdom
12 h-index
53 publications
6.2K citations
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris
Paris, France
12 h-index
41 publications
1.7K citations
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, United States
12 h-index
44 publications
3.2K citations

University of Toronto
Toronto, Canada
12 h-index
30 publications
1.4K citations

Niuvanniemi Hospital
Kuopio, Finland
11 h-index
44 publications
3.1K citations

Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, United States
11 h-index
74 publications
20.4K citations
1–8 of 2K
Repository · 14 publications · 479 citations
12
h-index
12 publications · 394 citations
10
h-index
10 publications · 201 citations
10
h-index
NEJM · 9 publications · 1.9K citations
9
h-index
CMRO · 8 publications · 323 citations
8
h-index
1–5