Precedent Skepticism

Precedent Skepticism is a theoretical framework within legal theory that challenges the foundational assumption that prior judicial decisions necessarily bind or justify future rulings, by arguing that the authority of precedent is neither logically compulsory nor consistently determinable in legal reasoning.

2

Publications

23

Citations

5

Authors

12

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

0

Authors

5

  1. MK
    Miriam Kass

    The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, United States

    1 publications · 12 citations

    1

    h-index

  2. CH
    Craig Hemmens

    Boise State University, United States

    1 publications · 11 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. MW
    Margery W. Shaw

    University of Michigan, United States

    1 publications · 12 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. RV
    Rolando V. del Carmen

    Sam Houston State University, United States

    1 publications · 11 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. KE
    Kathryn E. Scarborough

    Eastern Kentucky University, United States

    1 publications · 11 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 5

Venues

  1. Journal of Criminal Justice

    1 publications · 11 citations

    1

    h-index

  2. American Journal of Law & Medicine

    1 publications · 12 citations

    1

    h-index

1–2