Precedent Skepticism
Precedent Skepticism is a theoretical framework within legal theory that challenges the foundational assumption that prior judicial decisions necessarily bind or justify future rulings, by arguing that the authority of precedent is neither logically compulsory nor consistently determinable in legal reasoning.
2
Publications
23
Citations
5
Authors
12
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
0
Parents
2
1–2 of 2
5
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, United States
1 publications · 12 citations
1
h-index
1
h-index
1
h-index
1
h-index
1
h-index
1–5 of 5
12
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Houston, United States
1 h-index
2 publications
24 citations
Eastern Kentucky University
Richmond, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
11 citations
Columbia University
New York, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
12 citations
Sam Houston State University
Huntsville, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
11 citations
Boise State University
Boise, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
11 citations
Yale University
New Haven, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
12 citations
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
12 citations
University of Houston
Houston, United States
1 h-index
2 publications
24 citations
1–8 of 12
1 publications · 11 citations
1
h-index
1 publications · 12 citations
1
h-index
1–2