Partiality Presumptions

Partiality Presumptions is a legal doctrine in arbitration law that presumes an arbitrator’s lack of impartiality based on objective circumstances or relationships suggesting a reasonable apprehension of bias, thereby distinguishing it from actual proven bias by focusing on the appearance of partiality rather than subjective intent.

30

Publications

1.6K

Citations

37

Authors

24

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

7

Authors

37

  1. GK
    Guy Kahane

    University of Oxford, United Kingdom

    2 publications · 48 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. BS
    Bernhard Salow

    Northeast Catholic College, United States

    2 publications · 34 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. MW
    Monika Wörle

    Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany

    1 publications · 21 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. GF
    Gerald F. Cavanagh

    University of Detroit Mercy, United States

    1 publications · 11 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. EK
    Emiel Krahmer

    Tilburg University, Netherlands

    1 publications · 45 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 37

Venues

  1. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice

    6 publications · 351 citations

    6

    h-index

  2. Ethics

    3 publications · 567 citations

    3

    h-index

  3. Philosophy &amp Public Affairs

    2 publications · 146 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. Journal of Moral Philosophy

    1 publications · 12 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)

    Repository · 1 publications · 17 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5