Moralistic Judgments

Moralistic Judgments is a linguistic and cognitive construct within the framework of Nonviolent Communication that refers to evaluations or assertions implying rightness or wrongness of actions or individuals based on moral, ethical, or societal standards, thereby fostering blame, criticism, or justification rather than fostering empathy and understanding.

198

Publications

14.6K

Citations

383

Authors

205

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

39

Authors

383

  1. PT
    Peter Taylor‐Gooby

    University of Kent, United Kingdom

    2 publications · 47 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. MA
    Marcus Arvan

    University of Tampa, United States

    2 publications · 85 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. JK
    Joshua Knobe

    Yale University, United States

    2 publications · 132 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. TS
    Tamara Shefer

    University of the Western Cape, South Africa

    2 publications · 78 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. WM
    Will M. Gervais

    University of Kentucky, United States

    2 publications · 178 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5 of 383

Venues

  1. PLoS ONE

    5 publications · 356 citations

    5

    h-index

  2. Personality and Individual Differences

    4 publications · 214 citations

    4

    h-index

  3. Cognition

    4 publications · 498 citations

    4

    h-index

  4. Choice Reviews Online

    CRO · 3 publications · 226 citations

    3

    h-index

  5. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    3 publications · 298 citations

    3

    h-index

1–5