Concepedia

Layout Rule Checking

Layout Rule Checking is a formal verification methodology in electronic design automation that systematically ensures a physical layout conforms to a foundry-specified set of geometric and connectivity constraints to guarantee manufacturability and electrical correctness.

76

Publications

2.4K

Citations

224

Authors

71

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

7

Parents

Publications

76

RouteNet

Zhiyao Xie, Yu-Hung Huang, Guan-Qi Fang et al. · 2018 · 208 citations

, , +17

Magic: A VLSI Layout System

John K. Ousterhout, Gordon T. Hamachi, Robert N. Mayo et al. · Design Automation Conference · 1984 · 181 citations

, , +13

Magic: A VLSI Layout System

John K. Ousterhout, Gordon T. Hamachi, Robert N. Mayo et al. · 21st Design Automation Conference Proceedings · 1984 · 145 citations

, , +13

ICCAD-2012 CAD contest in fuzzy pattern matching for physical verification and benchmark suite

J. Andres Torres · 2012 · 117 citations

, , +16

The Magic VLSI Layout System

John K. Ousterhout, Gordon T. Hamachi, Robert N. Mayo et al. · IEEE Design & Test of Computers · 1985 · 95 citations

, , +9

1–5 of 76

Authors

224

  1. JK
    John K. Ousterhout

    University of California, Berkeley, United States

    10 publications · 594 citations

    10

    h-index

  2. GT
    G. Taylor

    University of California, Berkeley, United States

    6 publications · 505 citations

    6

    h-index

  3. WS
    Walter S. Scott

    University of California, Berkeley, United States

    5 publications · 380 citations

    5

    h-index

  4. GT
    Gordon T. Hamachi

    University of California, Berkeley, United States

    4 publications · 431 citations

    4

    h-index

  5. RN
    Robert N. Mayo

    University of California, Berkeley, United States

    4 publications · 431 citations

    4

    h-index

1–5 of 224

Institutions

71

  1. University of California, Berkeley

    Berkeley, United States

    9 h-index

    26 publications

    2.4K citations

  2. IBM (United States)

    Armonk, United States

    7 h-index

    20 publications

    250 citations

  3. Intel (United States)

    Santa Clara, United States

    4 h-index

    4 publications

    75 citations

  4. Siemens (Hungary)

    Budapest, Hungary

    3 h-index

    8 publications

    214 citations

  5. Mentor Technologies

    Tulsa, United States

    3 h-index

    6 publications

    185 citations

  6. Stanford University

    Stanford, United States

    3 h-index

    5 publications

    164 citations

  7. Imec the Netherlands

    Eindhoven, Netherlands

    2 h-index

    6 publications

    92 citations

  8. Digital Wave (United States)

    Centennial, United States

    2 h-index

    2 publications

    40 citations

1–8 of 71

Venues

  1. Design Automation Conference

    Conference · 11 publications · 429 citations

    11

    h-index

  2. 21st Design Automation Conference Proceedings

    Conference · 5 publications · 226 citations

    5

    h-index

  3. 5

    h-index

  4. 5

    h-index

  5. 19th Design Automation Conference

    Conference · 3 publications · 43 citations

    3

    h-index

1–5