Juristic Casuistry
Juristic Casuistry is a method of legal reasoning within Early Modern Legal Thought that resolves particular moral and juridical dilemmas by applying general legal principles to specific cases through a systematic analysis of circumstances, distinguishing itself from abstract jurisprudence by its case-based, context-sensitive approach to legal judgment.
16
Publications
511
Citations
20
Authors
9
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
1
Parents
16
Albert R. Jonsen · Metamedicine · 1986 · 77 citations
Vattel's Law of Nations: Diplomatic Casuistry for the Protestant Nation
Ian Hunter · Grotiana · 2010 · 54 citations
Casuistry: Between Legal Concept and Social Praxis
Baber Johansen · Islamic Law and Society · 1995 · 35 citations
1–5 of 16
20
1
h-index
1
h-index
1
h-index
1
h-index
1 publications · 37 citations
1
h-index
1–5 of 20
9
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
77 citations
Fachhochschule Salzburg
Salzburg, Austria
1 h-index
1 publications
12 citations

University of Salzburg
Salzburg, Austria
1 h-index
1 publications
12 citations
SA Health
Adelaide, Australia
1 h-index
1 publications
30 citations
University of San Francisco
San Francisco, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
77 citations

Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
1 h-index
1 publications
15 citations
University of New Brunswick
Fredericton, Canada
1 h-index
1 publications
12 citations
New York University
New York, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
19 citations
1–8 of 9
AHR · 2 publications · 51 citations
2
h-index
2 publications · 89 citations
2
h-index
1 publications · 14 citations
1
h-index
1 publications · 35 citations
1
h-index
1 publications · 54 citations
1
h-index
1–5