Jurisdictional Implementation Differences
Jurisdictional Implementation Differences is a regulatory framework-level phenomenon characterized by the variation in the application and enforcement of leverage ratio requirements across different national or regional authorities, distinguishing it from uniform global standards by reflecting local policy choices, institutional capacities, and supervisory practices.
9
Publications
317
Citations
25
Authors
24
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
3
Parents
9
Ross Bailie, Veronica Matthews, Sarah Larkins et al. · BMJ Open · 2017 · 39 citations · Full text
Public Affairs, Health Policy, Health Services Administration +17
1–5 of 9
25
1
h-index
1
h-index
1
h-index
1
h-index
1
h-index
1–5 of 25
24

James Cook University
Townsville, Australia
1 h-index
1 publications
39 citations
Menzies School of Health Research
Darwin, Australia
1 h-index
2 publications
78 citations

The University of Adelaide
Adelaide, Australia
1 h-index
1 publications
101 citations
College of Law
Riga, Latvia
1 h-index
1 publications
16 citations

Radboud University Nijmegen
Nijmegen, The Netherlands
1 h-index
2 publications
84 citations
Northern Territory Health Services
Darwin, Australia
1 h-index
1 publications
39 citations

UNSW Sydney
Sydney, Australia
1 h-index
1 publications
39 citations

The University of Queensland
Brisbane, Australia
1 h-index
1 publications
101 citations
1–8 of 24
1 publications · 12 citations
1
h-index
RECIEL · 1 publications · 14 citations
1
h-index
1 publications · 42 citations
1
h-index
1 publications · 101 citations
1
h-index
1 publications · 68 citations
1
h-index
1–5