Judicial Self-restraint
Judicial Self-Restraint is a principle of constitutional adjudication wherein a court limits its own power by deferring to legislative decisions, particularly in the review of statutes, on the grounds that elected bodies, rather than the judiciary, are constitutionally empowered to make policy choices.
34
Publications
1.7K
Citations
37
Authors
27
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
2
34
Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law
Günther Teubner · Law & Society Review · 1983 · 698 citations
Law, Jurisprudence, Private Law +9
Immunity versus human rights: the Pinochet case
Andrea Bianchi · European Journal of International Law · 1999 · 72 citations · Full text
The Rise and Fall of Judicial Self-Restraint
Richard A. Posner · 2012 · 59 citations · Full text
Law, Jurisprudence, Public Law +12
1–5 of 34
37
2
h-index
2
h-index
1
h-index
1
h-index
1 publications · 16 citations
1
h-index
1–5 of 37
27
University of Oxford
Oxford, United Kingdom
1 h-index
1 publications
43 citations

University of Calgary
Calgary, Canada
1 h-index
2 publications
62 citations

University of the Witwatersrand
Johannesburg, South Africa
1 h-index
1 publications
27 citations

University of Exeter
Exeter, United Kingdom
1 h-index
1 publications
15 citations

Northern Illinois University
DeKalb, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
29 citations
San Joaquin Delta College
Stockton, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
29 citations

Bocconi University
Milan, Italy
1 h-index
1 publications
54 citations
Bradley University
Peoria, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
37 citations
1–8 of 27
3 publications · 69 citations
3
h-index
Repository · 3 publications · 62 citations
3
h-index
2 publications · 103 citations
2
h-index
2 publications · 22 citations
2
h-index
EuConst · 1 publications · 23 citations
1
h-index
1–5