Judicial Amendment Review
Judicial Amendment Review is a constitutional mechanism through which courts assess the validity of proposed or enacted amendments to a constitution, distinguishing it from legislative or executive review by its reliance on judicial interpretation and adherence to higher constitutional principles.
8
Publications
151
Citations
13
Authors
7
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
6
Parents
8
1–5 of 8
13
1
h-index
1
h-index
1
h-index
1
h-index
1
h-index
1–5 of 13
7

University of Pretoria
Pretoria, South Africa
1 h-index
1 publications
14 citations
Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry
Banda Aceh, Indonesia
1 h-index
4 publications
52 citations

University of Göttingen
Göttingen, Germany
1 h-index
1 publications
13 citations

UNSW Sydney
Sydney, Australia
1 h-index
1 publications
39 citations

Icesi University
Santiago de Cali, Colombia
1 h-index
1 publications
10 citations

Bangor University
Bangor, United Kingdom
1 h-index
1 publications
13 citations
Brigham Young University
Provo, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
16 citations
1–7 of 7
2 publications · 53 citations
2
h-index
1 publications · 22 citations
1
h-index
EPL · 1 publications · 11 citations
1
h-index
1 publications · 26 citations
1
h-index
1 publications · 13 citations
1
h-index
1–5