Judicial Amendment Review

Judicial Amendment Review is a constitutional mechanism through which courts assess the validity of proposed or enacted amendments to a constitution, distinguishing it from legislative or executive review by its reliance on judicial interpretation and adherence to higher constitutional principles.

8

Publications

151

Citations

13

Authors

7

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

6

Authors

13

  1. CF
    Chairul Fahmi

    Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry, Indonesia

    1 publications · 13 citations

    1

    h-index

  2. AK
    Adem Kassie Abebe

    University of Pretoria, South Africa

    1 publications · 14 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. MS
    Muhammad Syauqi Bin-Armia

    University of Göttingen, Germany

    1 publications · 13 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. AR
    Adam R. Brown

    Brigham Young University, United States

    1 publications · 16 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. MS
    Muhammad Siddiq Armia

    Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry, Indonesia

    1 publications · 13 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 13

Venues

  1. International Journal of Constitutional Law

    2 publications · 53 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. Constitutional Review

    1 publications · 22 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. European Public Law

    EPL · 1 publications · 11 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. Israel Law Review

    1 publications · 26 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies

    1 publications · 13 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5