Interpretive Argument

An Interpretive Argument is a formal proposition that specifies the warranted inferences from test scores to intended interpretations or decisions, distinguishing itself from other validity-related constructs by centering on the logical coherence and evidentiary support for the proposed meanings attributed to assessment results.

45

Publications

3.3K

Citations

81

Authors

53

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

7

Variants

Argument-based Validity

Authors

81

  1. FM
    Fabrizio Macagno

    Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal

    4 publications · 104 citations

    4

    h-index

  2. MT
    Michael T. Kane

    American College Testing, United States

    4 publications · 866 citations

    4

    h-index

  3. DW
    Douglas Walton

    University of Windsor, Canada

    3 publications · 76 citations

    3

    h-index

  4. NM
    Neil MacCormick

    University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom

    2 publications · 108 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. GS
    Giovanni Sartor

    University of Bologna, Italy

    2 publications · 65 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5 of 81

Venues

  1. Language Testing

    5 publications · 544 citations

    5

    h-index

  2. Informal Logic

    4 publications · 96 citations

    3

    h-index

  3. Argumentation

    2 publications · 69 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. Educational Assessment

    2 publications · 314 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. Journal of Educational Measurement

    2 publications · 112 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5