Inductive Argumentation
Inductive Argumentation is a form of mathematical reasoning that belongs to the genus of argumentation strategies and is differentiated by its reliance on specific instances or patterns to infer general principles or conjectures, typically involving probabilistic or plausible inference rather than deductive certainty.
84
Publications
4.4K
Citations
134
Authors
87
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
15
Parents
84
Daniel N. Osherson, Edward E. Smith, Ormond Wilkie et al. · Psychological Review · 1990 · 906 citations
Arthur W. Burks · Philosophy of Science · 1946 · 228 citations
R. A. Fisher and Fiducial Argument
S. L. Zabell · Statistical Science · 1992 · 179 citations · Full text
The Nature of Archaeological Explanation
John M. Fritz, Fred Plog · American Antiquity · 1970 · 175 citations
1–5 of 84
134
2
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
1–5 of 134
87
Cardiff University
Cardiff, United Kingdom
2 h-index
2 publications
122 citations
University of Illinois Chicago
Chicago, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
43 citations

Hanken School of Economics
Helsinki, Finland
2 h-index
3 publications
490 citations

University of Massachusetts Amherst
Amherst Center, United States
2 h-index
3 publications
70 citations
New York University
New York, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
79 citations
University of Winnipeg
Winnipeg, Canada
2 h-index
2 publications
159 citations

Lund University
Lund, Sweden
2 h-index
2 publications
66 citations

UNSW Sydney
Sydney, Australia
2 h-index
5 publications
200 citations
1–8 of 87
6 publications · 619 citations
6
h-index
4 publications · 206 citations
4
h-index
2 publications · 60 citations
2
h-index
2 publications · 27 citations
2
h-index
JHP · 2 publications · 58 citations
2
h-index
1–5