Inductive Argumentation

Inductive Argumentation is a form of mathematical reasoning that belongs to the genus of argumentation strategies and is differentiated by its reliance on specific instances or patterns to infer general principles or conjectures, typically involving probabilistic or plausible inference rather than deductive certainty.

84

Publications

4.4K

Citations

134

Authors

87

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

15

Authors

134

  1. SM
    Saku Mantere

    Hanken School of Economics, Finland

    2 publications · 388 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. AW
    Arthur W. Burks

    University of Michigan, United States

    2 publications · 251 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. AF
    Aidan Feeney

    Queen's University Belfast, United Kingdom

    2 publications · 50 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. UH
    Ulrike Hahn

    Birkbeck, University of London, United Kingdom

    2 publications · 122 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. DW
    Douglas Walton

    University of Winnipeg, Canada

    2 publications · 159 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5 of 134

Venues

  1. Philosophy of Science

    6 publications · 619 citations

    6

    h-index

  2. Informal Logic

    4 publications · 206 citations

    4

    h-index

  3. Argumentation

    2 publications · 60 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. Philosophy

    2 publications · 27 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. Journal of the history of philosophy

    JHP · 2 publications · 58 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5