Hearsay Rule

The Hearsay Rule is an evidentiary principle within comparative evidence law that excludes out-of-court statements offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted, on the ground that such statements lack the reliability ensured by contemporaneous cross-examination and oath.

10

Publications

279

Citations

13

Authors

8

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

1

Authors

13

  1. AC
    Anne Cossins

    UNSW Sydney, Australia

    2 publications · 25 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. JS
    Jessica Silbey

    Suffolk University, United States

    1 publications · 15 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. DL
    David L. Faigman

    University of California Hastings College of the Law, United States

    1 publications · 13 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. SL
    Stephan Landsman

    DePaul University, United States

    1 publications · 10 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. DE
    Douglas E. Beloof

    Brigham Young University, United States

    1 publications · 14 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 13

Venues

  1. Psychiatry Psychology and Law

    2 publications · 25 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. eYLS (Yale Law School)

    Repository · 2 publications · 28 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. Michigan Law Review

    1 publications · 21 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. Noûs

    1 publications · 132 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. Harvard Law Review

    1 publications · 20 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5