Harmonization Of Evidence Rules

Harmonization of Evidence Rules is a conceptual framework within cross-border evidence gathering that establishes standardized principles and procedures for the admissibility, collection, and evaluation of evidence across different legal jurisdictions, thereby ensuring consistency, mutual recognition, and interoperability of evidentiary standards while minimizing conflicts arising from divergent national rules.

4

Publications

108

Citations

10

Authors

7

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

1

Authors

10

  1. KS
    Ken Sikaris

    The University of Melbourne, Australia

    1 publications · 56 citations

    1

    h-index

  2. GJ
    Graham Jones

    St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Australia

    1 publications · 56 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. DM
    Daniel Mansell

    1 publications · 17 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. CH
    Catherine Heard

    Birkbeck, University of London, United Kingdom

    1 publications · 17 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. JT
    Jill Tate

    Queensland Health, Australia

    1 publications · 56 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 10

Venues

  1. New Journal of European Criminal Law

    2 publications · 27 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. Clinica Chimica Acta

    CCA · 1 publications · 56 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. Common Market Law Review

    CMLR · 1 publications · 25 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. Risk Analysis

    1 publications · 10 citations

1–4