Forensic Deliberation

Forensic Deliberation is a theoretical framework within deliberative rhetoric that systematically analyzes past events to assess accountability and assign blame, distinguishing itself from other deliberative modes by focusing on retrospective judgment rather than future-oriented policy or present-focused ceremonial evaluation.

18

Publications

792

Citations

25

Authors

24

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

6

Authors

25

  1. GT
    G. Thomas Goodnight

    University of Southern California, United States

    2 publications · 400 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. PK
    Pascal Kintz

    Institut de Médecine et d'Epidémiologie Africaines, France

    1 publications · 44 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. AH
    Andrea Herepath

    Lancaster University, United Kingdom

    1 publications · 39 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. CH
    Christopher Hamlin

    University of Notre Dame, United States

    1 publications · 19 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. JP
    J. Paul Fedoroff

    Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre, Canada

    1 publications · 35 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 25

Venues

  1. Argumentation and Advocacy

    2 publications · 400 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. Medical Anthropology

    1 publications · 25 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. 1

    h-index

  4. Late imperial China

    1 publications · 12 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. 1

    h-index

1–5