Concepedia

Examination Strategy

Examination Strategy is a scholarly methodological construct within the domain of patent law that specifies the systematic approach for assessing the compliance and merit of divisional applications with respect to original disclosure and procedural requirements.

35

Publications

1.3K

Citations

79

Authors

63

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

16

Parents

Publications

35

Is the Time Allocated to Review Patent Applications Inducing Examiners to Grant Invalid Patents? Evidence from Microlevel Application Data

Michael Frakes, Melissa F. Wasserman · The Review of Economics and Statistics · 2016 · 190 citations

, , +12

Patent examination at the State Intellectual Property Office in China

Johannes Liegsalz, Stefan Wagner · Research Policy · 2012 · 126 citations · Full text

, , +11

Effects of inconsistent eyewitness statements on mock-jurors' evaluations of the eyewitness, perceptions of defendant culpability and verdicts.

Garrett L. Berman, Douglas J. Narby, Brian L. Cutler · Law and Human Behavior · 1995 · 103 citations

, , +17

Is the Time Allocated to Review Patent Applications Inducing Examiners to Grant Invalid Patents?: Evidence from Micro-Level Application Data

Michael Frakes, Melissa F. Wasserman · SSRN Electronic Journal · 2014 · 82 citations · Full text

, , +12

What determines the duration of patent examination in China? An outcome-specific duration analysis of invention patent applications at SIPO

Tony W. Tong, Kun Zhang, Zi‐Lin He et al. · Research Policy · 2018 · 71 citations

, , +11

1–5 of 35

Authors

79

  1. MF
    Michael Frakes

    Duke University, United States

    3 publications · 289 citations

    3

    h-index

  2. SN
    Sadao Nagaoka

    Hitotsubashi University, Japan

    3 publications · 50 citations

    3

    h-index

  3. MF
    Melissa F. Wasserman

    The University of Texas at Austin, United States

    3 publications · 289 citations

    3

    h-index

  4. BV
    Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie

    Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium

    1 publications · 49 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. AC
    Alan C. Marco

    Georgia Institute of Technology, United States

    2 publications · 47 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5 of 79

Institutions

63

  1. Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry

    Tokyo, Japan

    3 h-index

    3 publications

    50 citations

  2. United States Patent and Trademark Office

    Alexandria, United States

    3 h-index

    5 publications

    114 citations

  3. Hitotsubashi University

    Tokyo, Japan

    2 h-index

    3 publications

    43 citations

  4. Tokyo Keizai University

    Tokyo, Japan

    2 h-index

    2 publications

    35 citations

  5. Tilburg University

    Tilburg, The Netherlands

    2 h-index

    2 publications

    83 citations

  6. Georgia Institute of Technology

    Atlanta, United States

    2 h-index

    2 publications

    47 citations

  7. Binus University

    Jakarta, Indonesia

    1 h-index

    1 publications

    10 citations

  8. Duke University

    Durham, United States

    1 h-index

    1 publications

    82 citations

1–8 of 63

Venues

  1. Research Policy

    7 publications · 365 citations

    7

    h-index

  2. SSRN Electronic Journal

    Repository · 3 publications · 115 citations

    3

    h-index

  3. El-Mujtama Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat

    2 publications · 63 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. 1

    h-index

  5. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy

    JEMS · 1 publications · 14 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5