Epistemic Argumentation
Epistemic Argumentation is a form of argumentation in which the primary genus is reasoning aimed at justifying beliefs, and the differentia is its focus on the epistemic quality of reasons—specifically, how well those reasons support knowledge-constitutive norms such as truth, evidence, and rational acceptability—within processes of individual or collective belief formation and revision.
315
Publications
19.3K
Citations
414
Authors
253
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
89
Parents
315
Contemporary debates in epistemology
Choice Reviews Online · 2005 · 970 citations
Contextualism, Skepticism, and the Structure of Reasons
Stewart Cohen · Noûs · 1999 · 741 citations
Disagreement as Evidence: The Epistemology of Controversy
David Christensen · Philosophy Compass · 2009 · 414 citations
Humanities, Philosophy, Epistemology +10
1–5 of 315
414
5
h-index
4
h-index
4
h-index
3
h-index
3
h-index
1–5 of 414
253
University of Oxford
Oxford, United Kingdom
7 h-index
11 publications
308 citations

University of Amsterdam
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
5 h-index
5 publications
74 citations

University of St Andrews
St Andrews, United Kingdom
5 h-index
5 publications
127 citations
University of Copenhagen
Copenhagen, Denmark
4 h-index
4 publications
134 citations
University of Southern California
Los Angeles, United States
4 h-index
5 publications
281 citations
Wageningen University & Research
Wageningen, The Netherlands
4 h-index
8 publications
270 citations
California Southern University
Chandler, United States
4 h-index
4 publications
260 citations
University of California, Davis
Davis, United States
3 h-index
7 publications
486 citations
1–8 of 253
17 publications · 720 citations
14
h-index
PPR · 13 publications · 2.1K citations
13
h-index
11 publications · 427 citations
11
h-index
10 publications · 663 citations
10
h-index
11 publications · 382 citations
10
h-index
1–5