Epistemic Argumentation

Epistemic Argumentation is a form of argumentation in which the primary genus is reasoning aimed at justifying beliefs, and the differentia is its focus on the epistemic quality of reasons—specifically, how well those reasons support knowledge-constitutive norms such as truth, evidence, and rational acceptability—within processes of individual or collective belief formation and revision.

315

Publications

19.3K

Citations

414

Authors

253

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

89

Authors

414

  1. AH
    Anthony Hunter

    University College London, United Kingdom

    5 publications · 146 citations

    5

    h-index

  2. CL
    Christoph Lumer

    University of Siena, Italy

    4 publications · 123 citations

    4

    h-index

  3. ON
    Omid Noroozi

    Wageningen University & Research, Netherlands

    4 publications · 158 citations

    4

    h-index

  4. LM
    Luca Moretti

    University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom

    3 publications · 106 citations

    3

    h-index

  5. MT
    Matthias Thimm

    University of Koblenz and Landau, Germany

    3 publications · 49 citations

    3

    h-index

1–5 of 414

Venues

  1. Informal Logic

    17 publications · 720 citations

    14

    h-index

  2. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research

    PPR · 13 publications · 2.1K citations

    13

    h-index

  3. Australasian Journal of Philosophy

    11 publications · 427 citations

    11

    h-index

  4. Philosophical Studies

    10 publications · 663 citations

    10

    h-index

  5. Synthese

    11 publications · 382 citations

    10

    h-index

1–5