Doctrinal Comparison is a systematic method within comparative legal methodology that analyzes legal rules, principles, and concepts across jurisdictions through the lens of formal sources of law to identify structural and functional similarities and differences, distinguishing it from broader socio-legal or policy-oriented comparative approaches.
141
Publications
6.1K
Citations
174
Authors
109
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
22
Publications
141
Aggregating Sets of Judgments: An Impossibility Result
Christian List, Philip Pettit · Economics and Philosophy · 2002 · 629 citations · Full text
Law, Jurisprudence, Mathematics +7
1–5 of 141
Authors
174
- CV
2
h-index
- ES
2
h-index
- NR
2
h-index
- HCH. C. Gutteridge
2 publications · 69 citations
2
h-index
- KM
2
h-index
1–5 of 174
Institutions
109
UNSW Sydney
Sydney, Australia
4 h-index
4 publications
80 citations
University of Oxford
Oxford, United Kingdom
3 h-index
4 publications
722 citations
Council of Science Editors
Wheat Ridge, United States
3 h-index
3 publications
63 citations
Utrecht University
Utrecht, The Netherlands
2 h-index
2 publications
44 citations
Max Planck Institute for Behavioral Economics
Bonn, Germany
2 h-index
2 publications
62 citations
Australian National University
Canberra, Australia
2 h-index
2 publications
639 citations
Cornell University
Ithaca, United States
2 h-index
3 publications
446 citations
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
305 citations
1–8 of 109
Venues
- The American Journal of Comparative Law
27 publications · 1.3K citations
19
h-index
- SSRN Electronic Journal
Repository · 10 publications · 495 citations
10
h-index
- International and Comparative Law Quarterly
4 publications · 453 citations
4
h-index
- International Journal of Constitutional Law
3 publications · 143 citations
3
h-index
- Utrecht Law Review
3 publications · 51 citations
3
h-index
1–5