Critical Judgment

Critical Judgment is a specialized form of evaluative reasoning within aesthetic theory that systematically assesses the validity, coherence, and significance of aesthetic claims or artifacts according to established or emergent criteria of judgment.

176

Publications

18.8K

Citations

324

Authors

170

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

29

Authors

324

  1. JM
    Joanne Martin

    Stanford University, United States

    2 publications · 445 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. CT
    Chin‐Chung Tsai

    National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taiwan

    2 publications · 51 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. AL
    Anne Lethaby

    University of Auckland, New Zealand

    2 publications · 55 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. MS
    Mark Siegler

    University of Chicago, United States

    2 publications · 161 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. SA
    Shanthi Ameratunga

    University of Auckland, New Zealand

    2 publications · 55 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5 of 324

Venues

  1. 3

    h-index

  2. Quarterly Journal of Speech

    3 publications · 349 citations

    3

    h-index

  3. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy

    2 publications · 34 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. PEDIATRICS

    2 publications · 50 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. American Behavioral Scientist

    ABS · 2 publications · 45 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5