Constitutional Rhetoric is a genre of legal rhetoric that systematically employs constitutional principles, doctrines, and interpretive methods to construct persuasive arguments about the meaning, legitimacy, or application of constitutional provisions within judicial, political, or public discourse.
48
Publications
1.8K
Citations
61
Authors
30
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
3
Parents
Publications
48
1–5 of 48
Authors
61
- EC
2
h-index
- AA
2
h-index
- WH
2
h-index
- WK
2
h-index
- PW
2
h-index
1–5 of 61
Institutions
30
New York Law School
New York, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
117 citations
New York University
New York, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
27 citations
Louisiana State University
Baton Rouge, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
33 citations
University of Glasgow
Glasgow, United Kingdom
1 h-index
2 publications
118 citations
University of Illinois System
Urbana, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
19 citations
Harvard University
Cambridge, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
12 citations
San Diego State University
San Diego, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
11 citations
University of Łódź
Lodz, Poland
1 h-index
1 publications
14 citations
1–8 of 30
Venues
- Quarterly Journal of Speech
3 publications · 45 citations
3
h-index
- International Journal of Constitutional Law
2 publications · 37 citations
2
h-index
- Journal of the Early Republic
2 publications · 327 citations
2
h-index
- Michigan Law Review
2 publications · 73 citations
2
h-index
- Critical Review
2 publications · 48 citations
2
h-index
1–5