Constitutional Balancing

Constitutional Balancing is a judicial method within constitutional adjudication that distinguishes itself from other interpretive approaches by systematically weighing competing constitutional interests or rights to resolve conflicts in a manner that upholds the overall structure and foundational principles of the constitution.

35

Publications

2.4K

Citations

29

Authors

20

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

3

Authors

29

  1. KM
    K. Moller

    London School of Economics and Political Science, United Kingdom

    3 publications · 114 citations

    3

    h-index

  2. RA
    Robert Alexy

    Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Germany

    3 publications · 521 citations

    3

    h-index

  3. JB
    Jacco Bomhoff

    London School of Economics and Political Science, United Kingdom

    2 publications · 32 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. SF
    Sergio Fabbrini

    Libera Università Internazionale degli Studi Sociali Guido Carli, Italy

    2 publications · 44 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. NP
    Niels Petersen

    Max Planck Institute for Behavioral Economics, Germany

    2 publications · 39 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5 of 29

Venues

  1. International Journal of Constitutional Law

    6 publications · 743 citations

    6

    h-index

  2. SSRN Electronic Journal

    Repository · 5 publications · 149 citations

    5

    h-index

  3. Law & Ethics of Human Rights

    4 publications · 200 citations

    4

    h-index

  4. German Law Journal

    2 publications · 46 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. West European Politics

    WEP · 1 publications · 24 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5