Constitutional Adjudication
Constitutional Adjudication is a mode of judicial decision-making in which a court interprets and applies constitutional norms to resolve disputes about the validity of governmental acts or laws and to enforce the distribution of powers and protection of rights established by the constitution.
346
Publications
13.9K
Citations
390
Authors
140
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
50
346
The Forms and Limits of Adjudication
Lon L. Fuller, Kenneth Winston · Harvard Law Review · 1978 · 933 citations
Law, Jurisprudence, Public Law +10
The Supreme Court and the attitudinal model revisited
Choice Reviews Online · 2003 · 892 citations
Robert M. Cover · Harvard Law Review · 1983 · 558 citations
Law, Constitutional Law, Public Law +12
The Origin and Scope of the American Doctrine of Constitutional Law
James B. Thayer · Harvard Law Review · 1893 · 286 citations
1–5 of 346
390
5
h-index
5 publications · 186 citations
5
h-index
4
h-index
3
h-index
3
h-index
1–5 of 390
140
Yale University
New Haven, United States
10 h-index
11 publications
577 citations
New York University
New York, United States
9 h-index
9 publications
357 citations
University of Oxford
Oxford, United Kingdom
6 h-index
6 publications
111 citations
University of Chicago
Chicago, United States
5 h-index
6 publications
176 citations

University of Toronto
Toronto, Canada
5 h-index
5 publications
95 citations
University of California, Berkeley
Berkeley, United States
4 h-index
4 publications
154 citations

University of Hong Kong
Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong
4 h-index
5 publications
93 citations
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
4 h-index
5 publications
96 citations
1–8 of 140
37 publications · 3K citations
21
h-index
18 publications · 578 citations
16
h-index
Repository · 31 publications · 608 citations
16
h-index
CRO · 17 publications · 2.2K citations
14
h-index
9 publications · 271 citations
9
h-index
1–5