Constituency Comparison

Constituency Comparison is a methodological framework within Dependency Grammar that systematically evaluates syntactic structures by identifying and contrasting the constituent-like groupings formed through dependency relations against phrase-structure configurations in order to delineate the theoretical and operational distinctions between dependency and constituency-based approaches to sentence analysis.

59

Publications

4.4K

Citations

96

Authors

62

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

11

Authors

96

  1. BE
    Bruce E. Cain

    California Institute of Technology, United States

    3 publications · 313 citations

    3

    h-index

  2. MP
    Morris P. Fiorina

    California Institute of Technology, United States

    3 publications · 313 citations

    3

    h-index

  3. JF
    John Ferejohn

    California Institute of Technology, United States

    3 publications · 313 citations

    3

    h-index

  4. LE
    Lilliard E. Richardson

    University of Missouri, United States

    3 publications · 165 citations

    3

    h-index

  5. TD
    Thomas D. Lancaster

    Emory University, United States

    2 publications · 436 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5 of 96

Venues

  1. Political Research Quarterly

    PRQ · 4 publications · 218 citations

    4

    h-index

  2. Party Politics

    3 publications · 457 citations

    3

    h-index

  3. Legislative Studies Quarterly

    3 publications · 88 citations

    3

    h-index

  4. Political Studies

    2 publications · 120 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. American Political Science Review

    2 publications · 268 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5