Comparative Exclusionary Rules

Comparative Exclusionary Rules is a scholarly framework that systematically analyzes and contrasts the legal doctrines, judicial applications, and constitutional rationales governing the exclusion of unconstitutionally obtained evidence across different jurisdictions or legal systems.

3

Publications

50

Citations

3

Authors

2

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

1

Authors

3

  1. KR
    Kent Roach

    University of Toronto, Canada

    1 publications · 14 citations

    1

    h-index

  2. YK
    Yale Kamisar

    University of Michigan, United States

    1 publications · 10 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. PF
    Peter F. Nardulli

    University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, United States

    1 publications · 26 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. RS
    Robert S. Chang

    Harvard University, United States

    1 publications · 10 citations

    0

    h-index

1–4 of 3

Institutions

2

  1. Northern Illinois University

    DeKalb, United States

    1 h-index

    1 publications

    26 citations

  2. University of Michigan

    Ann Arbor, United States

    1 h-index

    1 publications

    10 citations

1–2 of 2

Venues

  1. American Bar Foundation Research Journal

    1 publications · 26 citations

    1

    h-index

  2. Michigan Law Review

    1 publications · 10 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. Manitoba Law Journal

    1 publications · 14 citations

    1

    h-index

1–3