Chilling Effect Doctrine

The "Chilling Effect Doctrine" is a legal theory in labor and constitutional law that identifies when employer or governmental actions, though not outright prohibitive, deter employees from exercising statutory or constitutional rights—particularly in collective action or speech—through the threat of reprisal, thereby suppressing protected conduct below the level expected if rights were fully exercisable.

13

Publications

497

Citations

15

Authors

12

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

1

Authors

15

  1. DW
    David W. Sosa

    University of Michigan, United States

    1 publications · 32 citations

    1

    h-index

  2. PF
    Peter Feuille

    University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, United States

    1 publications · 81 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. BC
    Brandice Canes‐Wrone

    Princeton University, United States

    1 publications · 10 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. TW
    Thomas W. Hazlett

    Clemson University, United States

    1 publications · 32 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. TB
    Trine Baumbach

    University of Copenhagen, Denmark

    1 publications · 18 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 15

Venues

  1. Bergen Journal of Criminal Law & Criminal Justice

    BJCLCJ · 1 publications · 18 citations

    1

    h-index

  2. 1

    h-index

  3. Faculty publications

    1 publications · 140 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. SSRN Electronic Journal

    Repository · 1 publications · 10 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. Columbia Law Review

    1 publications · 18 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5