The objective of this experiment was to develop a new computer-controlled simulated digestion system to predict the digestible energy (DE) and metabolizable energy (ME) of unconventional plant protein meals for growing pigs. Nine meals tested included 1 source of rapeseed meal, 4 sources of cottonseed meal, 2 sources of sunflower meal, and 2 sources of peanut meal. Twenty growing pigs (Duroc × [Landrace × Large White]) with an initial body weight (BW) of 41.7 ± 2.6 kg were allotted to a replicated 10 × 3 incomplete Latin square design to determine the DE and ME of 1 basal diet and 9 experimental diets formulated with 9 unconventional plant protein meals. The DE and ME values of unconventional plant protein meals were calculated by the difference method. The in vitro digestible energy (IVDE) of 1 basal diet, 9 experimental diets, and 9 unconventional plant protein meals were determined with 5 replicates of each sample in a complete randomized arrangement. The IVDE/DE or IVDE/ME ranged from 0.96 to 0.98 or 1.00 to 1.01, and the correlation coefficient between IVDE and DE or ME was 0.97 or 0.98 in 10 experimental diets. Accordingly, the IVDE/DE or IVDE/ME ranged from 0.86 to 1.05 or 0.96 to 1.20, and the correlation coefficient between IVDE and DE or ME was 0.92 or 0.91 in 9 unconventional plant protein meals. The coefficient of variation (CV) of IVDE was less than that of DE and ME in the experimental diets (0.43%, 0.80%, and 0.97% for CV of IVDE, DE and ME, respectively) and unconventional plant protein meals (0.92%, 4.84%, and 6.33% for CV of IVDE, DE and ME, respectively). The regression equations to predict DE from IVDE in 10 experimental diets and 9 unconventional plant protein meals were DE = 0.8851 × IVDE +539 (R ² = 0.9411, residual standard deviation [RSD] = 23 kcal/kg DM, P < 0.01) and DE = 0.9880 × IVDE + 166 (R ² = 0.8428, RSD = 182 kcal/kg DM, P < 0.01), respectively. There was no statistical difference in the slopes (P = 0.82) or intercepts (P = 1.00) of these 2 equations. Thus, 10 diets and 9 unconventional plant protein meals were pooled to establish the regression equation of DE on IVDE as: DE = 0.9813 × IVDE +187 (R ² = 0.9120, RSD = 118 kcal/kg DM, P < 0.01). The regression equations to predict ME from IVDE in 10 experimental diets and 9 unconventional plant protein meals were ME = 0.9559 × IVDE +146 (R ² = 0.9697, RSD = 18 kcal/kg DM, P < 0.01) and ME = 0.9388 × IVDE + 3 (R ² = 0.8282, RSD = 182 kcal/kg DM, P < 0.01), respectively. There was no statistical difference in slopes (P = 0.97) but significant difference between the intercepts (P = 0.02) of these 2 equations. Our results indicate IVDE has similar response to the DE but different response to the ME in 10 experimental diets and 9 unconventional plant protein meals. Therefore, IVDE is more suitable to predict DE than ME of diets and unconventional plant protein meals for growing pigs.

	Year	Citations

About