Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports · 2015 · 24 citations · 21 references
ComputingData ScienceForecastingPredictive AnalyticsStatistical ModelingForecast EvaluationForecasting MethodsPredictive ModelingProbabilistic ForecastingTime Series ForecastingTime Series PredictionDemographic CovariatesMachine Learning Forecasting ModelsPredictive Performance AnalyticsQuantitative Forecasting ModelsStatistical Post-processingTournament Predictors
Abstract Predicting the outcome of a single sporting event is difficult; predicting all of the outcomes for an entire tournament is a monumental challenge. Despite the difficulties, millions of people compete each year to forecast the outcome of the NCAA men’s basketball tournament, which spans 63 games over 3 weeks. Statistical prediction of game outcomes involves a multitude of possible covariates and information sources, large performance variations from game to game, and a scarcity of detailed historical data. In this paper, we present the results of a team of modelers working together to forecast the 2014 NCAA men’s basketball tournament. We present not only the methods and data used, but also several novel ideas for post-processing statistical forecasts and decontaminating data sources. In particular, we highlight the difficulties in using publicly available data and suggest techniques for improving their relevance.
21
Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine.
Jerome H. Friedman · The Annals of Statistics · 2001 · 29K citations · Full text
Classification and Regression by randomForest
Andy Liaw, Matthew C. Wiener · 2007 · 18.4K citations
Neural networks for optimization and signal processing
Choice Reviews Online · 1993 · 1.2K citations