Near Surface Geophysics · 2015 · 118 citations · 8 references
Applied GeophysicsEngineeringGeomorphologyArchaeological ExcavationArchaeologyGeophysical Signal ProcessingSite CharacterizationGpr DatasetsEarth ScienceSocial SciencesGeophysicsGeospatial MappingRadar InterpretationArchaeological RecordSubsurface GeologyReflection ProfilesArchaeological EvidenceCartographySynthetic Aperture RadarGeographySeismic ImagingPolarity ChangesGeologyRadarSeismic Reflection ProfilingRemote Sensing
Ground‑penetrating radar interpretation must integrate amplitude slice maps, isosurface renderings, adjusted reflection profiles, and individual trace analyses to understand reflection features in complex geological and archaeological contexts. Topographically adjusted profiles, combined with excavation and outcrop data, reveal reflectivity changes and source materials, while polarity analysis of individual traces helps identify buried material types.
An integrated approach to ground‐penetrating radar interpretation should include not only the standard amplitude slice maps and isosurface renderings but also an analysis of individual reflection traces and adjusted and processed reflection profiles. Only when all those basic datasets are interpreted can the plethora of reflection features at various depths and locations within a grid be understood, especially in complex geological and archaeological settings. Topographically adjusted profiles can provide important clues to changes in reflectivity along a transect, indicating why certain amplitude features are visible (or not) in slice maps. An integration of excavation and outcrop data with reflection profiles can often indicate what features are producing high‐amplitude reflections and which are yielding no reflection at all. Even individual reflection traces can be studied for polarity changes, which can help in identifying the types of buried materials that are producing reflections. All these datasets, some of which are often overlooked, must be integrated during interpretation, especially in complicated ground conditions.
8
Interpreting ground-penetrating radar for archaeology
Choice Reviews Online · 2013 · 172 citations
Immo Trinks, Bernth Johansson, Jaana Gustafsson et al. · Archaeological Prospection · 2010 · 114 citations · Full text
Exploration Geophysics, Engineering, Archaeological Excavation +20
Brian N. Damiata, John M. Steinberg, Douglas J. Bolender et al. · Journal of Archaeological Science · 2012 · 49 citations