Choice Reviews Online · 1999 · 266 citations · 0 references
Public AffairsPolitical SciencePublic PolicyAmerican PoliticsDecentralizationFederalismFiscal ReformIntergovernmental TransfersCongressional ReformFederal ReformNew FederalismPublic Policy AgendasPublic Revenue SharingRepublican GovernmentRepublican HistoryRepublican Ideology
From the 1970s to the early 1990s, Republican leaders enacted three major federal reforms that pursued decentralization but differed markedly in goals, assumptions, politics, and outcomes. Conlan’s updated book offers a comprehensive survey of intergovernmental reform from Nixon through the 104th Congress. He explains conservatives’ focus on federal reform, analyzes Nixon’s New Federalism, the Reagan revolution, and the 104th Congress, and traces the evolution of federalism politics and ideology over three decades while proposing future scenarios.
In the period from 1970 to the early 1990s, Republican leaders launched three major reforms of the federal system. Although all three initiatives advanced decentralization as a goal, they were remarkably different in their policy objectives, philosophical assumptions, patterns of politics, and policy outcomes. Expanding and updating his acclaimed book, New Federalism: Intergovernmental Reform from Nixon to (1988), Timothy Conlan provides a comprehensive look at intergovernmental reform from Nixon to the 104th Congress. The stated objectives of Republican reformers evolved from rationalizing and decentralizing an activist government, to rolling back the welfare state, to replacing it altogether. Conlan first explains why conservatives have placed so much emphasis on federal reform in their domestic agendas. He then examines Nixon's New Federalism, including management reforms and revenue sharing; analyzes the policies and politics of the Reagan revolution; and reviews the legislative limitations and achievements of the 104th Congress. Finally, he traces the remarkable evolution of federalism reform politics and ideology during the past 30 years and provides alternative scenarios for the future of American federalism.