Polarized Political Communication, Oppositional Media Hostility, and Selective Exposure

Kevin Arceneaux, Martin Johnson, Chad Murphy

The Journal of Politics · 2012 · 312 citations · 29 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The hostile media effect shows that balanced reporting is perceived as biased, and in today’s fragmented media landscape partisan outlets may heighten viewers’ antagonism toward news, though selective exposure can mitigate this hostility. The study examines how partisan news programs influence media perceptions in six laboratory experiments. The authors investigate mechanisms by which selective exposure moderates the impact of counterattitudinal programming on hostile media perceptions. Results indicate that counterattitudinal shows increase hostile media perceptions, but offering choice reduces oppositional media hostility.

Abstract

Previous research has consistently documented a hostile media effect in which people see bias in balanced reporting on political controversies. In the contemporary fragmented media environment, partisan news outlets intentionally report political news from ideological perspectives, raising the possibility that ideologically biased news may cause viewers to become increasingly suspicious of and antagonistic toward news media—which we call oppositional media hostility. However, the fragmented media environment also gives television viewers ample opportunities to tune out news outlets with which they disagree as well as the news altogether, and this should moderate oppositional media hostility. We investigate the effects of partisan news shows on media perceptions across six laboratory-based experiments. We find that counterattitudinal news programming is more likely to induce hostile media perceptions than proattitudinal programming, but that the presence of choice blunts oppositional media hostility. We explore possible mechanisms that underlie the moderating effects of selective exposure.

References

29