Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2025 · 11 citations · 167 references
Natural SciencesAstronomyPhysicsAstrophysicsPlanetary AstronomyPlanetary ScienceExoplanet Host StarsExoplanetary SystemsPlanetary InteriorsStellar StructurePlanetary Density ProfilesPlanetary Mass DistributionPlanetary Mass-radius RelationsRadial VelocitiesRadial Velocity MeasurementsStellar Mass DistributionStellar Parameters Of Planet HostsStellar Radii
ABSTRACT In this paper, we present a homogeneous analysis of close-in Neptune planets. To do this, we compile a sample of TESS-observed planets using a ranking criterion which takes into account the planet’s period, radius, and the visual magnitude of its host star. We use archival and new HARPS data to ensure every target in this sample has precise radial velocities. This yields a total of 64 targets, 46 of which are confirmed planets and 18 of which show no significant radial velocity signal. We explore the mass–radius distribution, planetary density, stellar host metallicity, and stellar and planetary companions of our targets. We find 26 per cent of our sample are in multiplanet systems, which are typically seen for planets located near the lower edge of the Neptunian desert. We define a ‘gold’ subset of our sample consisting of 33 confirmed planets with planetary radii between 2$R_{\oplus}$ and 10$R_{\oplus}$. With these targets, we calculate envelope mass fractions (EMF) using the GAS gianT modeL for Interiors (GASTLI). We find a clear split in EMF between planets with equilibrium temperatures below and above 1300 K, equivalent to an orbital period of $\sim$3.5 d. Below this period, EMFs are consistent with zero, while above they typically range from 20 per cent to 40 per cent, scaling linearly with the planetary mass. The orbital period separating these two populations coincides with the transition between the Neptunian desert and the recently identified Neptunian ridge, further suggesting that different formation and/or evolution mechanisms are at play for Neptune planets across different close-in orbital regions.
167
<tt>emcee</tt>: The MCMC Hammer
Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · 2013 · 11.9K citations · Full text
Computing, Computer Science, Physics +14
Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research
Adrian E. Raftery · Sociological Methodology · 1995 · 6.9K citations
Computing, Biostatistics, Sociology +17
Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite
G. Ricker, Joshua N. Winn, R. Vanderspek et al. · Journal of Astronomical Telescopes Instruments and Systems · 2014 · 4K citations · Full text
A. Vallenari, A. G. A. Brown, T. Prusti et al. · Astronomy and Astrophysics · 2022 · 3.9K citations · Full text
Natural Sciences, Astronomy, Physics +17
Formation of the Giant Planets by Concurrent Accretion of Solids and Gas
James B. Pollack, O. Hubickyj, Peter Bodenheimer et al. · Icarus · 1996 · 3.1K citations
Natural Sciences, Astronomy, Physics +14