npj Digital Medicine · 2025 · 50 citations · 52 references
ComputingBiomedical InformaticsComputer ScienceBiomedical Text MiningInformation RetrievalNatural Language ProcessingClinical Natural Language ProcessingHealth Information RetrievalInformation ExtractionNamed Entity RecognitionClinical Language ModelsClinical Named Entity RecognitionClinical Text RetrievalEntity RetrievalInformation Retrieval EvaluationMedical Document RetrievalRetrieval-augmented GenerationRetrieval-augmented Language Models
Large language models (LLMs) with retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) have improved information extraction over previous methods, yet their reliance on embeddings often leads to inefficient retrieval. We introduce CLinical Entity Augmented Retrieval (CLEAR), a RAG pipeline that retrieves information using entities. We compared CLEAR to embedding RAG and full-note approaches for extracting 18 variables using six LLMs across 20,000 clinical notes. Average F1 scores were 0.90, 0.86, and 0.79; inference times were 4.95, 17.41, and 20.08 s per note; average model queries were 1.68, 4.94, and 4.18 per note; and average input tokens were 1.1k, 3.8k, and 6.1k per note for CLEAR, embedding RAG, and full-note approaches, respectively. In conclusion, CLEAR utilizes clinical entities for information retrieval and achieves >70% reduction in token usage and inference time with improved performance compared to modern methods.
52
Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods
Frank Wilcoxon · Biometrics Bulletin · 1945 · 14.4K citations
Business, Computer Science, Multi-criteria Decision Making +8
Neural Architectures for Named Entity Recognition
Guillaume Lample, Miguel Ballesteros, Sandeep Subramanian et al. · 2016 · 4.4K citations · Full text