Journal of Applied Econometrics · 2024 · 20 citations · 29 references
ComputingBusiness EconomicsEconomicsForecastingMachine LearningPredictive AnalyticsEnsemble ForecastingEnsemble MethodsForecast EvaluationForecasting MethodsPredictive ModelingTime Series ForecastingCombining ForecastsCoverageInflation ForecastingMachine Learning For EstimationMachine Learning Forecasting ModelsMachine Learning-based ForecastingPrediction IntervalsStochastic Volatility Models
Summary Medeiros et al. (2021) (Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 39:1, 98–119) find that random forest (RF) outperforms US inflation forecasting benchmarks. We replicate the main results in Medeiros et al. (2021) and (1) considerably expand the set of machine learning methods, (2) analyse the predictive ability of both the initial and extended sets of methods on Canadian and UK data, (3) add results on coverage rates and widths of prediction intervals and (4) extend the sample from January 2016 to October 2022. Our narrow replication confirms the main findings of the original paper. However, the wider replication results suggest that other methods are competitive with RF and often more accurate. In addition, RF produces disappointing results during the coronavirus pandemic and subsequent high inflation of 2020–2022, whereas a stochastic volatility model and some gradient boosting methods produce more accurate forecasts.
29
Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine.
Jerome H. Friedman · The Annals of Statistics · 2001 · 29K citations · Full text
LightGBM: A Highly Efficient Gradient Boosting Decision Tree
Guolin Ke, Qi Meng, Thomas Finley et al. · HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2017 · 9.5K citations · Full text
Least Squares Support Vector Machine Classifiers
Johan A. K. Suykens, Joos Vandewalle · Neural Processing Letters · 1999 · 9.4K citations · Full text