International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · 2024 · 64 citations · 43 references
EngineeringChemical EngineeringEnvironmental EngineeringElectrochemical EngineeringEnergy PolicyLife Cycle AssessmentCarbon Emissions ManagementElectrochemical CellsEnergy ConversionLife Cycle Carbon AssessmentLow-carbon Energy TransitionRenewable EnergyCarbon Capture Life Cycle AssessmentCarbon Dioxide CaptureElectrolyzersEnergy System Life Cycle AssessmentHydrogen ProductionLife Cycle Performance AnalysisSteam ReformingWater Electrolysis
The United States' focus on decarbonization has spawned interest among policymakers in deploying water electrolysis technology for clean hydrogen production. However, water electrolyzers also raise concerns regarding their substantial use of carbon-intensive materials. Here, we conduct a comprehensive life-cycle analysis (LCA) of three prominent water electrolyzer technologies to investigate the environmental implications of their manufacturing and life cycles under different energy sources. All electrolyzer technologies employing low-carbon energy (nuclear, solar, or wind) exhibit life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of 0.3–2.4 kg-CO2-eq/kg-H2. This is significantly lower than the corresponding GHG emissions for hydrogen production via both conventional steam methane reforming and alternative autothermal reforming with carbon capture and storage (by > 50%). The well-to-gate GHG emissions of low-carbon electrolyzers (0–0.36 kg-CO2-eq/kg-H2) qualify for Tier I of the production tax credit in the U.S.’ Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, indicating their suitability for producing decarbonized hydrogen under this program.
43
Life Cycle Assessment of Metals: A Scientific Synthesis
Philip Nuss, Matthew J. Eckelman · PLoS ONE · 2014 · 734 citations · Full text
A.O. Oni, Karina Anaya, Temitayo Giwa et al. · Energy Conversion and Management · 2022 · 582 citations · Full text