Journal of Environmental Management · 2024 · 30 citations · 50 references
EngineeringMaterials EngineeringMaterials ScienceGreen ChemistryResource RecoveryWaste ManagementBattery MaterialsMetal RecoveryRecyclingWaste Management SystemsWaste MinimizationWaste ReductionBattery RecyclingBinder MaterialsCritical Metal RecoveryLeachingLithium-ion Battery RecyclingRecycling Of Critical MetalsThermal TreatmentX-ray Diffraction Analysis
Efficient recycling of critical metals from spent lithium-ion batteries is vital for clean energy and sustainable industry growth. Conventional methods often fail to manage large waste volumes, leading to hazardous gas emissions and dangerous materials. This study investigates innovative methods for recovering critical metals from spent LIBs using synergistic leaching. The first step optimized thermal treatment conditions (570 °C for 2 h in air) to remove binder materials while maintaining cathode material crystallinity, confirmed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis. Next, response surface methodology (RSM), I-optimal, was used to examine the synergistic effects of sulfuric acid (SA) and organic acids (Org, citric and acetic acids) and their concentrations (SA: 0.5–2 M and Org: 0.1–2 M) on metal leaching for an eco-friendlier process. Results showed that adding citric acid to SA was more effective, especially at lower concentrations, than using acetic acid. The medium was tested to evaluate the impact of reductant addition. Remarkably, it was discovered that the optimized leaching mixture (1.25 M SA and 0.55 M citric acid) efficiently extracted metals without the need for any reductant like H2O2, highlighting its potential for a simpler and more eco-friendly recycling process. Further optimization identified the ideal solid-to-liquid ratio (62.5 g/L) to minimize acid use. Finally, RSM (D-optimal) was used to investigate the effects of time and temperature on leaching, achieving remarkable recovery rates of 99% ± 0.7 for Li, 98% ± 0.0 for Co, 90% ± 6.6 for Ni, and 92% ± 0.4 for Mn under optimized conditions at 189 min and 95 °C. Chemical cost analysis revealed this method is about 25% more cost-effective than conventional methods.
50
Lithium-Ion Battery Recycling─Overview of Techniques and Trends
Zachary J. Baum, Robert E. Bird, Xiang Yu et al. · ACS Energy Letters · 2022 · 680 citations
Development of a metal recovery process from Li-ion battery wastes
Shun Myung Shin, Nak Hyoung Kim, Jeong-Soo Sohn et al. · Hydrometallurgy · 2005 · 515 citations
Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Materials Engineering +14