RMD Open · 2024 · 26 citations · 30 references
MedicineClinical SciencesPharmacotherapyClinical PharmacologyImmunotherapyRheumatologyChronic Disease PharmacotherapyImmunotherapy SafetyInflammatory ArthritisPharmacologic ManagementResponse AssessmentRheumatoid ArthritisDisease Activity MeasurementInadequate TreatmentLong-term Safety Follow-upRadiographic ProgressionRefractory Rheumatoid ArthritisRheumatoid Arthritis PharmacotherapyRheumatoid Arthritis TherapyTreatment Sequence Comparators
OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and efficacy of upadacitinib versus adalimumab from SELECT-COMPARE over 5 years. METHODS: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to methotrexate were randomised to receive upadacitinib 15 mg once daily, placebo or adalimumab 40 mg every other week, all with concomitant methotrexate. By week 26, patients with insufficient response to randomised treatment were rescued; patients remaining on placebo switched to upadacitinib. Patients completing the 48-week double-blind period could enter a long-term extension. Safety and efficacy were assessed through week 264, with radiographic progression analysed through week 192. Safety was assessed by treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Efficacy was analysed by randomised group (non-responder imputation (NRI)) or treatment sequence (as observed). RESULTS: Rates of TEAEs were generally similar with upadacitinib versus adalimumab, although numerically higher rates of herpes zoster, lymphopenia, creatine phosphokinase elevation, hepatic disorder and non-melanoma skin cancer were reported with upadacitinib. Numerically greater proportions of patients randomised to upadacitinib versus adalimumab achieved clinical responses (NRI); Clinical Disease Activity Index remission (≤2.8) and Disease Activity Score based on C reactive protein <2.6 were achieved by 24.6% vs 18.7% (nominal p=0.042) and 31.8% vs 23.2% (nominal p=0.006), respectively. Radiographic progression was numerically lower with continuous upadacitinib versus adalimumab at week 192. CONCLUSION: The safety profile of upadacitinib through 5 years was consistent with the known safety profile of upadacitinib, with no new safety risks. Clinical responses were numerically higher with upadacitinib versus adalimumab at 5 years. Upadacitinib demonstrates a favourable benefit-risk profile for long-term rheumatoid arthritis treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02629159.
30
Daniel Aletaha, Tuhina Neogi, Alan J. Silman et al. · Arthritis & Rheumatism · 2010 · 9.6K citations · Full text
Medicine, Internal Medicine, Clinical Classification Systems +13
Josef S Smolen, Robert Landewé, Sytske Anne Bergstra et al. · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · 2022 · 1.8K citations · Full text
Cardiovascular and Cancer Risk with Tofacitinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis
Steven R. Ytterberg, Deepak L. Bhatt, Ted R. Mikuls et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2022 · 1.7K citations · Full text
How to read radiographs according to the Sharp/van der Heijde method.
D. van der Heijde · PubMed · 1999 · 1.2K citations
Baricitinib versus Placebo or Adalimumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis
Peter C. Taylor, Edward Keystone, Désirée van der Heijde et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2017 · 951 citations · Full text