Journal of Clinical Virology · 2024 · 16 citations · 28 references
Veterinary MedicineInfectious DiseasesDiagnostic MicrobiologyMolecular DiagnosticsVirologyInfectious Disease Molecular TestingRespiratory InfectionsRespiratory Infectious DiseasesRespiratory Tract InfectionsViral DiagnosticsViral InfectionsAnalytical SensitivityAnalytical Sensitivity AssessmentLower Limit Of QuantitationMultiplex Diagnostic AssaysMultiplex Respiratory PanelsRespiratory Viral InfectionsRespiratory VirusesViral Respiratory Infections
BACKGROUND: Viral respiratory Infections pose a health risk, especially to vulnerable patient populations. Effective testing programs can detect and differentiate these infections at an early stage, which is particularly important for high-risk clinical departments. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a multiplex PCR-panel for 16 different respiratory viruses on a fully-automated high-throughput platform. METHODS: Three multiplex-PCR assays were designed to run on the cobas5800/6800/8800 systems, consolidating 16 viral targets: RESP1: SARS-CoV-2, influenza-A/B, RSV; RESP2: hMPV, hBoV, hAdV, rhino-/ENV; RESP3: HPIV-1-4, hCoV-229E, hCoV-NL63, hCoV-OC43, hCoV-HKU1. Analytic performance was evaluated using digital-PCR based standards and international reference material. Clinical performance was determined by comparing results from clinical samples with reference assays. RESULTS: Analytical sensitivity (i.e. lower limit of detection (LoD), 95 % probability of detection) was determined as follows: SARS-CoV-2: 29.3 IU/ml, influenza-A: 179.9 cp/ml, influenza-B: 333.9 cp/ml and RSV: 283.1 cp/ml. LoDs of other pathogens ranged between 9.4 cp/ml (hCoV-NL63) and 21,419 cp/ml (HPIV-2). Linearity was verified over 4-7 log-steps with pooled standard differentials (SD) ranging between 0.18-0.70ct. Inter-/intra-run variability (precision) was assessed for all targets over 3 days. SDs ranged between 0.13-0.74ct. Positive agreement in clinical samples was 99.4 % and 95 % for SARS-CoV-2 and influenza-A respectively. Other targets were in the 80-100 % range. Negative agreement varied between 96.3-100 %. DISCUSSION: Lab-developed tests are a key factor for effective clinical diagnostics. The multiplex panel presented in this study demonstrated high performance and provides an easily scalable high-throughput solution for respiratory virus testing, e.g. for testing in high-risk patient populations.
28
Shi Zhao, Qianyin Lin, Jinjun Ran et al. · International Journal of Infectious Diseases · 2020 · 2K citations · Full text
Life Sciences, Infectious Diseases, Infectious Disease Epidemiology +14
Rapid and quantitative detection of human adenovirus DNA by real‐time PCR
Albert Heim, Carmen Ebnet, Gabi Harste et al. · Journal of Medical Virology · 2003 · 814 citations
Sonja J. Olsen, Amber Winn, Alicia Budd et al. · MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report · 2021 · 612 citations · Full text
Veterinary Medicine, Infectious Disease Control, Infectious Diseases +17