JCO Precision Oncology · 2024 · 47 citations · 18 references
MedicineMolecular MedicineOncologyBreast OncologyMolecular DiagnosticsMolecular OncologyBreast Cancer RecurrenceCancer BiomarkersCancer Molecular DiagnosticsCirculating Tumor Dna AnalysisNext-generation Sequencing In OncologyRecurrence MonitoringBreast Cancer PrognosisCirculating Tumor Dna DetectionCirculating Tumor Dna SequencingCirculating Tumor Dna TestingMolecular RelapseMolecular Residual Disease MonitoringPrognostic PredictionTumor-informed Assays
PURPOSE Here, we report the sensitivity of a personalized, tumor-informed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assay (Signatera) for detection of molecular relapse during long-term follow-up of patients with breast cancer. METHODS A total of 156 patients with primary breast cancer were monitored clinically for up to 12 years after surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. Semiannual blood samples were prospectively collected, and analyzed retrospectively to detect residual disease by ultradeep sequencing using ctDNA assays, developed from primary tumor whole-exome sequencing data. RESULTS Personalized Signatera assays detected ctDNA ahead of clinical or radiologic relapse in 30 of the 34 patients who relapsed (patient-level sensitivity of 88.2%). Relapse was predicted with a lead interval of up to 38 months (median, 10.5 months; range, 0-38 months), and ctDNA positivity was associated with shorter relapse-free survival ( P < .0001) and overall survival ( P < .0001). All relapsing triple-negative patients (n = 7/23) had a ctDNA-positive test within a median of 8 months (range, 0-19 months), while the 16 nonrelapsed patients with triple-negative breast cancer remained ctDNA-negative during a median follow-up of 58 months (range, 8-99 months). The four patients who had negative tests before relapse all had hormone receptor–positive (HR+) disease and conversely, five of the 122 nonrelapsed patients (all HR+) had an occasional positive test. CONCLUSION Serial postoperative ctDNA assessment has strong prognostic value, provides a potential window for earlier therapeutic intervention, and may enable more effective monitoring than current clinical tests such as cancer antigen 15-3. Our study provides evidence that those with serially negative ctDNA tests have superior clinical outcomes, providing reassurance to patients with breast cancer. For select cases with HR+ disease, decisions about treatment management might require serial monitoring despite the ctDNA-positive result.
18
Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Clinical Features and Patterns of Recurrence
Rebecca Dent, Maureen Trudeau, Kathleen I. Pritchard et al. · Clinical Cancer Research · 2007 · 5.1K citations · Full text
Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
Stefan Aebi, T. Davidson, Günther Gruber et al. · Annals of Oncology · 2010 · 2.9K citations · Full text
Phylogenetic ctDNA analysis depicts early-stage lung cancer evolution
Christopher Abbosh, Nicolai J. Birkbak, Gareth A. Wilson et al. · Nature · 2017 · 1.9K citations · Full text
Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
Elżbieta Senkus, S. Kyriakides, Shinji Ohno et al. · Annals of Oncology · 2015 · 1.6K citations · Full text