Annals of Internal Medicine · 2024 · 17 citations · 33 references
MedicinePhysical MedicineRehabilitation MedicineExercise PrescriptionMusculoskeletal RehabilitationPhysical TherapyExercise InterventionsExercise TherapyHip RehabilitationNeuromuscular TrainingOsteoarthritisResistance TrainingFunctional Stability TrainingHigh-intensity Functional TrainingHip Function AssessmentHip Osteoarthritis RehabilitationHip Rehabilitation ExerciseOsteoarthritis Exercise PrescriptionOsteoarthritis Exercise TherapyPhysiotherapy Rehabilitation
BACKGROUND: Exercise is recommended as first-line treatment for patients with hip osteoarthritis (OA). However, randomized controlled trials providing evidence for the optimal exercise type are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether progressive resistance training (PRT) is superior to neuromuscular exercise (NEMEX) for improving functional performance in patients with hip OA. DESIGN: Multicenter, cluster-randomized, controlled, parallel-group, assessor-blinded, superiority trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04714047). SETTING: Hospitals and physiotherapy clinics. PARTICIPANTS: = 78). INTERVENTION: Twelve weeks of PRT or NEMEX with 2 supervised 60-minute group sessions each week. The PRT intervention consisted of 5 high-intensity resistance training exercises targeting muscles at the hip and knee joints. The NEMEX intervention included 10 exercises and emphasized sensorimotor control and functional stability. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was change in the 30-second chair stand test (30s-CST). Key secondary outcomes were changes in scores on the pain and hip-related quality of life (QoL) subscales of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS). RESULTS: The mean changes from baseline to 12-week follow-up in the 30s-CST were 1.5 (95% CI, 0.9 to 2.1) chair stands with PRT and 1.5 (CI, 0.9 to 2.1) chair stands with NEMEX (difference, 0.0 [CI, -0.8 to 0.8] chair stands). For the HOOS pain subscale, mean changes were 8.6 (CI, 5.3 to 11.8) points with PRT and 9.3 (CI, 5.9 to 12.6) points with NEMEX (difference, -0.7 [CI, -5.3 to 4.0] points). For the HOOS QoL subscale, mean changes were 8.0 (CI, 4.3 to 11.7) points with PRT and 5.7 (CI, 1.9 to 9.5) points with NEMEX (difference, 2.3 [CI, -3.0 to 7.6] points). LIMITATION: Participants and physiotherapists were not blinded. CONCLUSION: In patients with hip OA, PRT is not superior to NEMEX for improving functional performance, hip pain, or hip-related QoL. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Independent Research Fund Denmark.
33
Carol Ewing Garber, Bryan Blissmer, Michael R. Deschenes et al. · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2011 · 9.1K citations · Full text
Sharon L. Kolasinski, Tuhina Neogi, Marc C. Hochberg et al. · Arthritis & Rheumatology · 2020 · 1.9K citations · Full text