JAMA Health Forum · 2024 · 13 citations · 28 references
MedicineOrthopaedic SurgeryOrthopedic SurgeryOutcomes ResearchPain ManagementPain MedicineClinical Practice GuidelinesGuideline ImplementationOpioid ManagementMatched Control GroupPeer ComparisonPeer Group ComparisonPeer InterventionPostoperative Opioid PrescribingPostoperative Opioid UsePrescription FeedbackShared Social Norms
Importance: Excess opioid prescribing after surgery can result in prolonged use and diversion. Email feedback based on social norms may reduce the number of pills prescribed. Objective: To assess the effectiveness of 2 social norm-based interventions on reducing guideline-discordant opioid prescribing after surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cluster randomized clinical trial conducted at a large health care delivery system in northern California between October 2021 and October 2022 included general, obstetric/gynecologic, and orthopedic surgeons with patients aged 18 years or older discharged to home with an oral opioid prescription. Interventions: In 19 hospitals, 3 surgical specialties (general, orthopedic, and obstetric/gynecologic) were randomly assigned to a control group or 1 of 2 interventions. The guidelines intervention provided email feedback to surgeons on opioid prescribing relative to institutionally endorsed guidelines; the peer comparison intervention provided email feedback on opioid prescribing relative to that of peer surgeons. Emails were sent to surgeons with at least 2 guideline-discordant prescriptions in the previous month. The control group had no intervention. Main Outcome and Measures: The probability that a discharged patient was prescribed a quantity of opioids above the guideline for the respective procedure during the 12 intervention months. Results: There were 38 235 patients discharged from 640 surgeons during the 12-month intervention period. Control-group surgeons prescribed above guidelines 36.8% of the time during the intervention period compared with 27.5% and 25.4% among surgeons in the peer comparison and guidelines arms, respectively. In adjusted models, the peer comparison intervention reduced guideline-discordant prescribing by 5.8 percentage points (95% CI, -10.5 to -1.1; P = .03) and the guidelines intervention reduced it by 4.7 percentage points (95% CI, -9.4 to -0.1; P = .05). Effects were driven by surgeons who performed more surgeries and had more guideline-discordant prescribing at baseline. There was no significant difference between interventions. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cluster randomized clinical trial, email feedback based on either guidelines or peer comparison reduced opioid prescribing after surgery. Guideline-based feedback was as effective as peer comparison-based feedback. These interventions are simple, low-cost, and scalable, and may reduce downstream opioid misuse. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05070338.
28
The Association of American Medical Colleges
FRED C. ZAPFFE · Academic Medicine · 1938 · 5.6K citations
New Persistent Opioid Use After Minor and Major Surgical Procedures in US Adults
Chad M. Brummett, Jennifer F. Waljee, Jenna Goesling et al. · JAMA Surgery · 2017 · 2K citations · Full text
When Should You Adjust Standard Errors for Clustering?
Alberto Abadie, Susan Athey, Guido W. Imbens et al. · National Bureau of Economic Research · 2017 · 1.4K citations