BDJ Open · 2024 · 13 citations · 39 references
DentistryDental Materials ScienceOrthodonticsDental MaterialsMechanical Properties Of Dental MaterialsSurface Properties Of Dental MaterialsDental AdhesivesDental CementsEnamel BondingGlass Ionomer CementsOrthodontic MaterialsStrength PropertiesAdhesive Failure ModesBond Failure ModesBond StrengthBond Strength To EnamelBondingCohesive FailureFailure ModesOrthodontic Bracket Bonding
Abstract Objective To evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of a restorative resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) for orthodontic bracket bonding. Materials and methods One hundred twenty-one human teeth were randomly divided into 11 groups ( n = 11) according to the surface treatment applied (H 3 PO 4 ± Transbond Plus (TSEP) or Scotchbond Universal (SU)), and the adhesive used (Riva LC HV (RIVA), Fuji Ortho (FUJI), and Transbond XT (TXT)). For each sample, a metal button was bonded. SBS tests were performed at 1 week and debonded specimens were observed for failure modes determination. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test was used to compare SBS differences and Fisher’s exact test to analyze the failure modes ( p < 0.05). Results TSEP + FUJI and H 3 PO 4 + SU + TXT showed the highest SBS values while H 3 PO 4 + TSEP + RIVA showed the lowest value. Cohesive failure and mixed failure were found in the groups with SU and TXT and adhesive failure in the other groups. Discussion/Conclusions The bonding of orthodontic attachments to enamel could be performed with any of the three materials studied. The use of a universal adhesive in the bonding protocol could optimize the adhesion values. Clinical studies would be needed to confirm the results obtained.
39
E Silverman, Morton Cohen, Richard S. Demke et al. · American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · 1995 · 137 citations · Full text