BMC Psychiatry · 2024 · 13 citations · 49 references
Social SciencesPsychiatryPsychologyBehavioral HealthClinical PsychologyMental Health CareAnxiety DisordersBehavior TherapyCognitive Behavioral TherapyTreatment Of Mental DisordersCognitive Behavior TherapyCognitive Interventions For AnxietyEfficacy Data EvaluationEfficacy Data ReviewGeneralized Anxiety Disorder TreatmentPsychoeducational Support GroupsTreatment Of Anxiety Disorders
BACKGROUND: Low-intensity cognitive behavioural therapy (LICBT) has been recommended as a primary intervention in the tiered care for mild to moderate generalised anxiety disorder. However, LICBT for generalised anxiety disorder are markedly diverse and efficacy data on various outcomes have not been systematically reviewed. This meta-analysis aimed to synthesise effect sizes of three NICE-recommended LICBT for generalised anxiety disorder: non-facilitated self-help, guided self-help, and psychoeducational groups. METHODS: A systematic literature review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) examining LICBT for generalised anxiety disorder in the last 23 years (2000-2023) was conducted. Efficacy data for anxiety, depression, and worry outcomes were separately meta-analysed. The study was reported following the PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: The systematic review identified 12 RCTs out of 1205 papers. The three meta-analyses consisted of 12 (anxiety), 11 (depression), and 9 (worry) effect sizes respectively, including total sample sizes of 1201 (anxiety), 1164 (depression), and 908 (worry). The adjusted effect sizes for reductions in anxiety (g = -0.63), depression (g = -0.48), and worry (g = -0.64) were all in the medium range, favouring LICBT over control conditions. Between-study heterogeneity was significant on anxiety and worry, with no specific moderators identified by meta-regression. CONCLUSIONS: LICBT has shown promise as an effective and efficient treatment modality for individuals with generalised anxiety disorder. Future research comparing various LICBT subtypes and treatment components will further inform clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This systematic review protocol has been registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; record ID CRD42021285590).
49
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Matthew J. Page, Joanne E. McKenzie, Patrick M. Bossuyt et al. · BMJ · 2021 · 95K citations · Full text
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Matthias Egger, George Davey Smith, Martin Schneider et al. · BMJ · 1997 · 56.3K citations
Kurt Kroenke, Robert L. Spitzer, Janet B. W. Williams · Journal of General Internal Medicine · 2001 · 44.2K citations · Full text
An Inventory for Measuring Depression
Aaron T. Beck · Archives of General Psychiatry · 1961 · 38.2K citations
A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety Disorder
Robert L. Spitzer, Kurt Kroenke, Janet B. W. Williams et al. · Archives of Internal Medicine · 2006 · 31.5K citations
Nursing, Psychiatry, Psychology +17