arXiv (Cornell University) · 2023 · 22 citations · 38 references
ComputingComputer ScienceComputer VisionMachine LearningNatural Language ProcessingDeep LearningGenerative ModelingLanguage ModelingLanguage ModelsQuestion AnsweringVisual Question AnsweringHallucination DetectionInstruction TuningKey Concept ExtractionLanguage Model PretrainingLarge Language ModelsMultimodal Machine LearningQuestion Formulation TechniqueVisual Hallucinations
Hallucination is a big shadow hanging over the rapidly evolving Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), referring to the phenomenon that the generated text is inconsistent with the image content. In order to mitigate hallucinations, existing studies mainly resort to an instruction-tuning manner that requires retraining the models with specific data. In this paper, we pave a different way, introducing a training-free method named Woodpecker. Like a woodpecker heals trees, it picks out and corrects hallucinations from the generated text. Concretely, Woodpecker consists of five stages: key concept extraction, question formulation, visual knowledge validation, visual claim generation, and hallucination correction. Implemented in a post-remedy manner, Woodpecker can easily serve different MLLMs, while being interpretable by accessing intermediate outputs of the five stages. We evaluate Woodpecker both quantitatively and qualitatively and show the huge potential of this new paradigm. On the POPE benchmark, our method obtains a 30.66%/24.33% improvement in accuracy over the baseline MiniGPT-4/mPLUG-Owl. The source code is released at https://github.com/BradyFU/Woodpecker.
38
Haotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu et al. · arXiv (Cornell University) · 2023 · 681 citations · Full text