JMIR Formative Research · 2023 · 30 citations · 30 references
ComputingBiomedical InformaticsHealth InformaticsClinical Decision SupportClinical InformaticsElectronic Health RecordsClinical Decision Support SystemsDecision Support In HealthcareDiagnostic Decision SupportElectronic Health Record IntegrationWorkflow-integrated Decision SupportClinical Decision Support System ImplementationDecision Support IntegrationEhr AdoptionElectronic Health Record Decision SupportElectronic Health Record WorkflowIt Systems IntegrationUse CasesVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis
BACKGROUND: Through our work, we have demonstrated how clinical decision support (CDS) tools integrated into the electronic health record (EHR) assist providers in adopting evidence-based practices. This requires confronting technical challenges that result from relying on the EHR as the foundation for tool development; for example, the individual CDS tools need to be built independently for each different EHR. OBJECTIVE: The objective of our research was to build and implement an EHR-agnostic platform for integrating CDS tools, which would remove the technical constraints inherent in relying on the EHR as the foundation and enable a single set of CDS tools that can work with any EHR. METHODS: We developed EvidencePoint, a novel, cloud-based, EHR-agnostic CDS platform, and we will describe the development of EvidencePoint and the deployment of its initial CDS tools, which include EHR-integrated applications for clinical use cases such as prediction of hospitalization survival for patients with COVID-19, venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, and pulmonary embolism diagnosis. RESULTS: The results below highlight the adoption of the CDS tools, the International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism-D-Dimer, the Wells' criteria, and the Northwell COVID-19 Survival (NOCOS), following development, usability testing, and implementation. The International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism-D-Dimer CDS was used in 5249 patients at the 2 clinical intervention sites. The intervention group tool adoption was 77.8% (4083/5249 possible uses). For the NOCOS tool, which was designed to assist with triaging patients with COVID-19 for hospital admission in the event of constrained hospital resources, the worst-case resourcing scenario never materialized and triaging was never required. As a result, the NOCOS tool was not frequently used, though the EvidencePoint platform's flexibility and customizability enabled the tool to be developed and deployed rapidly under the emergency conditions of the pandemic. Adoption rates for the Wells' criteria tool will be reported in a future publication. CONCLUSIONS: The EvidencePoint system successfully demonstrated that a flexible, user-friendly platform for hosting CDS tools outside of a specific EHR is feasible. The forthcoming results of our outcomes analyses will demonstrate the adoption rate of EvidencePoint tools as well as the impact of behavioral economics "nudges" on the adoption rate. Due to the EHR-agnostic nature of EvidencePoint, the development process for additional forms of CDS will be simpler than traditional and cumbersome IT integration approaches and will benefit from the capabilities provided by the core system of EvidencePoint.
30
Value of assessment of pretest probability of deep-vein thrombosis in clinical management
Philip S. Wells, David R. Anderson, Janis Bormanis et al. · The Lancet · 1997 · 1.2K citations
Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. 1996.
David L. Sackett, William Rosenberg, Julie A. Gray et al. · PubMed · 2007 · 1.2K citations
Michele G. Beckman, W. Craig Hooper, Sara E. Critchley et al. · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · 2010 · 1.1K citations
Pharmacy, Health Services Administration, Preventive Medicine +15
Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Thomas McGinn, Gordon Guyatt, Peter Wyer et al. · JAMA · 2000 · 1K citations
Medicine, Neurology, Psychiatry +14